Skip to content
Skip to content

The end of an era? Idle-O Apartments Inc. v. Charlyn Investments Ltd.

It is rare that a reasonably straightforward statutory provision receives consideration by the Court of Appeal three times within little more than a decade. Section 73 of the Land Title Act RSBC 1996 c.250 (“LTA”) is such a provision. Those inclined to technical arguments may protest this hat-trick was actually a joint effort between sectionContinue reading “The end of an era? Idle-O Apartments Inc. v. Charlyn Investments Ltd.”

Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Creative Non-Competition Clauses

By Alisha Parmar and Shafik Bhalloo Introduction Non-competition clauses are hardly a rarity in employment contracts. The classic non-competition clause seeks to protect the business of an employer by prohibiting a former employee from, generally speaking, competing with the employer once the employment relationship is terminated. It is well-established that courts are unsympathetic towards non-competitionContinue reading “Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Creative Non-Competition Clauses”

Everything you always wanted to know about suspending a determination (but were too afraid to ask)

INTRODUCTION The steps to receiving a suspension when appealing a determination of the Director of Employment Standards (the “Director”) to the Employment Standards Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) can be confusing and full of potholes, so it is best to plan ahead and know the terrain.  For applicants wanting to map out their route, this article willContinue reading “Everything you always wanted to know about suspending a determination (but were too afraid to ask)”

Supreme Court of Canada Holds that Pension Benefits Should Not Diminish Damages for Wrongful Dismissal

  by Devin Lucas and Shafik Bhalloo In IBM Canada Limited v. Richard Waterman[1], Richard Waterman (“Waterman”) was employed by IBM Canada Ltd. (“IBM”) for approximately 42 years before he was dismissed on March 23, 2009 without cause.  Waterman, aged 65, was given two months’ notice.  Prior to his dismissal, Waterman had been a long-standingContinue reading “Supreme Court of Canada Holds that Pension Benefits Should Not Diminish Damages for Wrongful Dismissal”

Supreme Court in securities case expands scope of consumer class actions

The Supreme Court of Canada has opened the door more widely to consumer class actions in a case which follows an Ontario Securities Commission settlement: AIC Limited v. Fischer, 2013 SCC 69.  The decision will be equally applicable to class action certification motions in British Columbia. One of the fundamental requirements to certification of a class action isContinue reading “Supreme Court in securities case expands scope of consumer class actions”

© 2025 Kornfeld LLP. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy